Skip to main content

Review of Class #9


Measurement

J Jay. Architect Tools. March 20. 2006. [Online Image]
Sourced from: http://bit.ly/2g2bCAK

For this week's online session, as a class we focused on the mathematical concept of measurement with specific emphasis on teaching area and length. The presentations by both of my classmates were fun and taught the concepts well. I especially enjoyed the creative and hands-on nature of the activities. I liked how Casey had the class measure their hands by tracing them on grid paper with 1/4 centimeter proportions. I also enjoyed Kursten's activity in which she connected magazine pictures with the definition and comparison stage of area which is crucial for understand when learning the concept of area. The reading that was assigned for his week also does a great job of making mathematical activities practical for students with activities suggested such as using a computer program to create two different rectangles that look similar, and then printing them for further comparison. Another great activity discussed int he reading was having students trace shoe prints and comparing the measurements with other students.

According to the slideshow and assigned readings for this week, teaching measurement should be done in three stages; definition/comparison: compare two things to determine which has a greater measure. Teachers can use experiments, investigations, etc. Secondly students must learn about nonstandard units: define measurements according to scoops, cubes, etc. The third stage is students learning about standard units such as centimeters, grams, etc.

In the beginning of the course Professor Bunz had stated that "you do not have to necessarily be good at math to be a good math teacher!". This is something that I am beginning to understand better and that connects with the assigned reading this week. I think it is imperative that as educators we are able to identify and understand common errors and misconceptions that students may have so that we are prepared and equipped with strategies to help foster understanding. The reading further states that when calculating perimeter and area, students may struggle with ruler placement, comparing lengths that do not align, confuse length with area, and multiply length by the width for shapes that are not rectangular.

I really enjoyed listening to Professor Bunz's presentation and study Evaluating and Integrating Digital Tools into the 21st Century Elementary Mathematics classroom. I agree that using technology in the classroom does positively impact student engagement and achievement. I think that her research and questioning of what functions a technological tool has and the quality of how the tool is used in mathematics is insightful and valid. See the image below for one of the models she introduced in her presentation. The SAMR model talks about the different ways technology can be used in the classroom.




The SAMR Model. This figure illustrates the SAMR model from Puentedura, R. (2014). Frameworks for educational technology: SAMR, the EdTech Quintet, and the Horizon Report.

I really enjoyed this week and I would like to thank Professor Bunz for sharing her research with us.

Cheers until next week!

Ashley





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rich Tasks for Week Four

This week in math we discussed the importance of providing students with rich tasks rooted in mathematics. A rich task encourages students to think creatively, work logically, communicate ideas, synthesize their results, analyze different viewpoints, look for commonalities and evaluate findings. San Jose Library. Group Work on Cards. July.1,2009. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2woSSlZ  For a task to be rich it must be engaging in the sense that it has the potential to engage students in mathematical thinking. It must also have a meaningful mathematical focus that connects to the mathematics curriculum, process and content expectations.  It is important to challenge students meaningfully through problem solving. A rich task will be grounded in problem solving and will encourage students to reason his/her way to new understanding. The student would accomplish this by using multiple math processes while the instructor would allow ample time for explanation, justi...

Growth Mindset for Week Two

This week in mathematics I have learned and applied my newfound growth mindset. I countered my fixed way of thinking with positivism, telling myself that if I apply myself and use my conceptual knowledge, I too can prevail in math. City Year New York. Growth Mindset. Feb.16,2016. Sourced from: http://bit.ly/2ffB0GL  When the professor attempted to explain the card trick in a mathematical formula, my mind reverted to a fixed way of thinking. My initial reaction was that I couldn't do it and I began to "check out" of the demonstration so to speak. Being a reflective practitioner and student, I realized that I needed to have more confidence in myself and my abilities. I will honestly say that it took some time for me to understand how the formula was rewritten (ie. algebraically). I did eventually come to an understanding and I think that it is evidence that my mindset is changing. As educators we must model attitudes and behaviors for our students. If we model a ...

Learning Styles in the Classroom for Week Three

This week in mathematics we focused on the gratification of mathematics as well as understanding how to approach various types of learners in the classroom. JoanDragonfly. Venn Diagram of 3 Learning Styles. June.8,2017. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2y2gQrz  I had fun trying various tests that helped me to identify what type of learner that I am and surprisingly I have discovered that I am equally an audio and visual learner. I think it is imperative that instructors design their lessons, delivery, and classroom environment to enrich and engage various types of learners (ie. kinesthetic, visual, and audio).  I think it is important that we encourage students to understand how they learn best whether it be auditorally, visually, or kinestheically. With this being said, I also think that educators shouldn't encourage students to label themselves. When someone labels themselves as a certain type of learner, I believe that students may internalize that definition ...